![]() |
| (Click to enlarge) |
There are a number of reasons for the new guidelines. Perhaps the most important reason is that there is now greater available pharmacotherapy and more information about potential adverse effects. But also new uncertainties concerning the effects of intensive glycemic control on macrovascular complications have emerged following the publication of ACCORD (as well as other studies).
The new elements of the new guidelines are:
1. The ADA has set the HbA1c goal at 7% in general, but with
some individualization (ACCORD). There
is a higher HbA1C for patients with advanced cardiovascular disease, reduced
life expectancy, and multiple medical problems and a lower HbA1C for patients
with newly diagnosed T2D and the “very motivated”
![]() |
| (Click to enlarge) |
2. Recognition that multiple agents needed: e.g., the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4)
inhibitors available since the last hyperglycemia guideline was published.
3. The ADA is advocating that clinicians avoid clearly
defined algorithms - less prescriptive and more patient-centered. Rather, the ADA says that recommendations ought
to be tailored to individual patient needs, preferences, and tolerances and should
be based on differences in age and disease course. Other factors affecting
individualized treatment plans include specific symptoms, comorbid conditions,
weight, race/ethnicity, sex, and lifestyle.
4. The mainstay of
any type 2 diabetes treatment program is still diet, exercise, and education. Metformin
is the preferred first-line drug, in the absence of contraindications. Data are
limited regarding use of agents other than metformin., however the ADA recommends
a layered approach (see Figure). A reasonable approach is combination therapy
with 1 to 2 additional oral or injectable agents, with the goal of minimizing
side effects to the extent possible.
5. To maintain glycemic control, the ADA says, many patients
will ultimately need insulin monotherapy or in combination with other
medications.


No comments:
Post a Comment