Here's an interesting piece by Juliet Mavromatis who is a general
internist based in Atlanta, Georgia in the Health Care Blog. It's titled “Why Doctors Interrupt”.
The article describes an interaction between Dr. Mavromatis
and a neurosurgeon about a patient’s headaches. Only a few sentences into her
opening description about the patient the neurosurgeon interrupts. Dr. Mavromatis
persists tenaciously despite the neurosurgeon’s interruption with her story but
describes the interaction leaving her with unease. She writes:
“Interruption is a pervasive communication style with
doctors. In a well known study by Beckman and Frankel
patients were allowed to complete their opening statement expressing their
agenda in its entirety in only 23% of physician interviews. The average
time to interruption was 18 seconds. This study’s findings have been
replicated by several others. In a more recent study of primary care residents,
patients were allowed to speak for only 12 seconds on average before they were
interrupted. Female patients experience interruption more frequently than
males. In contrast, studies have suggested higher rates
of patient satisfaction with physician visits during which patients
and doctors interrupt at similar frequency and also with visits in which there
is more “reflective” silent time during the conversation. Perhaps the
tendency to interrupt extends to all physician derived professional
communications, as in my case with the neurosurgeon on the phone.
Why do physicians interrupt? In practical terms,
throughout the course of a given day a physician may be tasked with listening
to twenty to thirty patient derived histories and with solving difficult
problems for each of these patients in a matter of ten to fifteen minutes. This
is a tough, if not impossible job. Consequently, once a physician
believes that the meat of the story is out there, he or she may respond and
interrupt before hearing details that the patient (or colleague) feels are important.
In more abstract terms interruption is a communication strategy that reinforces
physician dominance in the hierarchy of the patient-physician relationship.
The most frequent complaint that I hear from patients about
other physicians is that a physician did not “listen,” or did not “seem to
care” about their problem. My advice to physicians and medical trainees:
sit down, bite your tongue and wait. If you do interrupt, do so with brief
questions allowing your patient to return to his or her agenda. You might
be surprised and learn something, and no doubt you’ll certainly have happier
patients (and colleagues).”
The article by Juliet Mavromatis resonates with me because, as
I reflect on my own clinical practice, I agree it’s quite easy to
interrupt a patient just to keep to the designated time for a follow-up versus new
patient visit. After reading this article I am going to try in stop interrupting a patient.

No comments:
Post a Comment