Virtually every week a Brigham internal medicine resident
accompanies me in my outpatient clinic in order learn a bit more nephrology.
The residents are very smart and motivated. However, almost all are aiming to
either do oncology or cardiology. The best medical residents don’t seem to be
going into nephrology. This is true not
only at our training program at the Brigham but also elsewhere.
A fantastic article by Kenar Jhaveri and colleagues published in AJKD examines this issue and is “must-read”. The article isn’t available open access. It describes
an innovative modification to the internal medicine experience in nephrology
that seems effective in sparking greater interest in nephrology.
A companion paper from the same group, by Shah et al in CJASN provides an overview of the issues related to nephrology as a career
choice. The article is also not available open access.They write: “The exposure that students and residents
have to nephrology is likely to play an important role in the career choices
that they make and their ultimate satisfaction with this career choice is
likely influenced by several factors, including job opportunities….Failure to
understand the factors that influence trainees to choose nephrology as a career
and those that affect their satisfaction with this choice may impair the
ability to graduate a sufficient number of nephrologists to meet projected
demand.”
The articles raise important questions about whether we are
being sufficiently innovative in our approach towards attracting the brightest
stars in internal medicine to nephrology. The Jhaveri and Shah articles are
wake-up calls that we should heed.

http://www.nephronpower.com/2012/05/geriatric-workforce-shortage-what-can.html#comment-form
ReplyDelete